Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Cline

California Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1890No. 12940PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from an interlocutory decree of the Superior Court of Calaveras County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief C.

A. M. Mitchell died ■ intestate in February, 1882, seised of undivided parts of two placer-mining claims situated in Calaveras County, adjoining each other. The plaintiff, Sarah Mitchell, is the widow, administratrix, and one of the heirs of A. M. Mitchell, and individually, and as administratrix, brought this action for a partition of said mining claims, making the other heirs-—the children of A. M. Mitchell, and the other tenants in common, the devisees of John Batten, deceased *411— defendants. One of the claims sought to he partitioned is known as the Bowling Green Placer Mine,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Damrell v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Huston v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Snow v. KimmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Hendricks v. HendricksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Smith v. GreeneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Wight v. Ingram-Day Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Musick Consolidated Oil Co. v. ChandlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API