Legal Opinion

Whitely v. St. Louis, E. R. & W. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1911No. 457PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Logan County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Action by T. C. Whitely and others against the St. Louis, El Reno & Western Railway Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, C. J.

On December 20, 1907, T. C. Whitely and eight others, plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, filed in the office of the district court of Logan county their petition, which substantially states that theretofore, on March 20, 1907, certain causes came on to be heard in said court, among which was a suit by defendant in error against T. C. Whitely, one of the plaintiffs in error, which was on that date tried in said court; that 'defendant objected to the introduction of certain evidence by the plaintiff, which was overruled, and then demurred to the evidence as introduced by plaintiff, which…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. United States, Ex Rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Goldsborough v. HewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Richardson Et Vir v. BeidlemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Lopez v. TownsendNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Dubs ex rel. Dubs v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Gast v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. McKee v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API