Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Lynch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1899PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Error from the District Court of Kay County • hefora-A. Q. C. Bierer, District Judge. ■ Action by Burton S. Barnes and John W. Dalton, as-partners,against J. W. Lynch,the Ponca City Land & Improvement company, and others to recover certain lands and to quiet title thereto-. From a decree in favor of' the defendant, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Tarsney, J.:

The decree in this case was entered on February 21, 1898, when one hundred days were allowed the plainntiffs in error to mahe and serve -a case-made; fifteen days- thereafter was given to suggest amendments- thereto; the case to be settled upon five days’ notice. The case was served on May 28, 1898. July 1, 1898, notice was given that the case-made would be presented for settling and signing on July 6, 1898. The term of office of Justice Bierer, therfcrial judge, expired on'the 28th day of February, 1898; the case was signed and settled by 'him on July 7,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dakota County v. GliddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Elwell v. FosdickSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Babbitt v. CorbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  4. Weeks v. MedlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  5. Ehrman v. Astoria Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Smith v. PattonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Ward v. CharltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  3. Richardson Et Vir v. BeidlemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Elliott v. OrtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API