Russell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
— Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Wichita County of passing a forged instrument, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.
We deem it necessary to discuss but one question presented on behalf of appellant which relates to the manner and form of the organization of the grand jury which returned the bill of indictment against him. Appellant made a motion to quash the indictment based on what he claimed to the illegality of said grand jury.
An examination of Chapter 1, Title 7 of our Code of Criminal Procedure discloses that two methods are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Woolen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Ex Parte HollandCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Minor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Acuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Baeza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.