Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1921No. 6469PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Harrison. Tried below before the Honorable P. O. Beard. Appeal from a conviction of the unlawful possession of intoxicating; liquor; penalty, one year imprisonment in the penitentiary. The opinion states the case. Cited: Woolen v. State, 150 S. W. Rep., 1165; Mayfield v. State, 151 id., 303; Whiten v. State, 151 id., 1183.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, PRESIDING Judge.-

Conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors; punishment fixed at confinement in the-penitentiary for a period of one year.

The legality of the organization of the grand jury which found the indictment is attacked. The indictment was returned at the May term of the District Court, which began on the second day of that month. At the previous term, jury commissioners were duly appointed and' returned to the Clerk of the District Court, in due tinle, the names of the persons selected as grand jurors for the May term. The envelope containing this list…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Woolen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Ex Parte HollandCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Huskey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API