Legal Opinion

Martinez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 19, 1938No. 19253PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was convicted of the offense of murder with malice and his punishment was assessed at death.

It appears from the record that appellant and his associate in crime took a man and his wife, who desired to go into Mexico, to the Rio Grande River. There they both outraged the woman, killed the man and his wife, weighted them down, and dropped them into the river.

At the very threshold of the case, we are confronted with the question of the time and manner of the selection of the grand jury which indicted appellant with the offense charged. Article 333, C. C. P., provides as follows: "The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Donegan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Ex Parte HaywardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Ex parte PaxtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. United States v. Robert Glynn ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Ex Parte BeckerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API