Woolen v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
— Appellant moved to quash the indictment because it was found and returned by a grand jury which had been drawn by jury commissioners who were appointed by the court at the November term, 1911, to draw three grand juries for three separate terms of court, that is, the three terms following their appointment. The grand jury which returned this bill was drawn for the March term, 1912, which was the second term after the appointment of the jury commissioners who drew them. Motion was also made based upon the same ground to set aside the venire of jurors in attendance…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Irvin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Bickham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ex parte PaxtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.