Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 8, 1999No. 3070PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STILWELL, Judge:

In this medical malpractice case, Tommy L. Bridges, M.D. appeals the trial court’s decision to admit evidence of four possible scenarios regarding Belinda Sue Pearson’s future medical needs and expenses. Bridges claims the trial court erred in admitting evidence of future medical expenses that did not reach the “most probable” standard for admissibility. We affirm.

FACTS

Pearson sued Bridges for medical malpractice after complications from gallbladder surgery. During laparoscopic surgery in May 1992, Bridges cut the common bile duct instead of the cystic duct as intended. He…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Payton v. KearseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Gray v. Southern Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  3. Ward v. EptingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Armstrong Ex Rel. Estate of Armstrong v. WeilandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  5. Ellis Ex Rel. Ellis v. OliverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pearson v. BridgesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Wilder v. Blue Ribbon Taxicab Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Pearson v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Pound v. Wilcox Marketing IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
  5. Schaeffer v. Heidi D Williams MD LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API