Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1968No. Civ. 30889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCobey, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a declaratory relief action declaring that the defendant-employer is not obligated to pay the plaintiff-employee $20,000. The ease is concerned with the meaning of paragraph 7 in a letter contract of employment drawn by the employer and accepted in writing by the employee which letter confirmed a previous oral agreement between the parties.

This paragraph read as follows: “7. In the event the company decides to discontinue the plastic [sic] division, you will be guaranteed one year’s basic salary in advance at. time of termination. ’ ’ The basic salary was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Imbach v. SchultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Kitchel v. AcreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moss Development Co. v. GearyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Haskell v. CarliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Louisville Title Insurance v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Weiss v. Brentwood Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp v. Yosemite Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API