Houghton v. Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCobey, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in a declaratory relief action declaring that the defendant-employer is not obligated to pay the plaintiff-employee $20,000. The ease is concerned with the meaning of paragraph 7 in a letter contract of employment drawn by the employer and accepted in writing by the employee which letter confirmed a previous oral agreement between the parties.
This paragraph read as follows: “7. In the event the company decides to discontinue the plastic [sic] division, you will be guaranteed one year’s basic salary in advance at. time of termination. ’ ’ The basic salary was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Imbach v. SchultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Kitchel v. AcreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moss Development Co. v. GearyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Haskell v. CarliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Louisville Title Insurance v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Weiss v. Brentwood Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp v. Yosemite Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997