Legal Opinion

Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp v. Yosemite Ins. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1997No. B091492PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.

Without reserving any rights against its insured, an excess liability insurer agreed to and did indemnify its insured by contributing to the settlement of a third party’s action against the insured. The excess insurer then sued the insured’s other insurers, claiming it was entitled to reimbursement for the entire amount of its contribution to the settlement. That lawsuit spawned yet another action (this one), a bad faith claim by the insured against its excess insurer in which the insured contends the excess insurer’s failure to reserve its rights against the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CBS Broadcasting Inc. v. FIRMMAN'S FUND INS. COMPANYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE CO. v. Golden Eagle Ins. Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
  3. The Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Navigators Specialty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API