Legal Opinion

Poe v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 9, 1996No. 52, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

The primary issue we are called upon to determine in this case is whether the doctrine of transferred intent applies when a defendant, intending to kill one person, shoots and wounds that person, but the shot passes through the intended victim and kills an unintended victim. We are also asked to decide whether the trial court properly sentenced Petitioner. For the reasons set forth below, we find that the trial court properly applied the doctrine of transferred intent in the instant case, and find no error in Petitioner’s sentence. Accordingly, we uphold Petitioner’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. James O. BakkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  2. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Gladden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. Bartholomey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. EastmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court · 2000

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API