Legal Opinion

United States v. James O. Bakker

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1991No. 89-5687PublishedCited by 198 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

This appeal stems from the trial and sentencing of a well-known televangelist, James 0. Bakker. Bakker raises numerous challenges to his conviction for fraud and conspiracy. We affirm his conviction. Appellant also challenges his sentence on the grounds that the trial judge’s personal religious beliefs tainted the sentencing and that the trial court erred by rejecting Bakker’s attempt to classify his crimes as straddle crimes to be sentenced under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We hold that the trial court correctly determined that Bakker’s crimes did not…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by198 opinions

  1. State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. United States v. Dustin John HiggsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  3. Colon-Fontanez v. Municipality of San JuanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  5. Teague v. BakkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API