Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Bartlett

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Exceptions from Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

Tbis is an action for divorce on the grounds of extreme cruelty and habitual intemperance. At the trial the libellant and two other witnesses were introduced in support of the petition. Upon the close of her case, counsel for the libellee announced that there was no defense. The court thereupon dismissed the libel on the general ground that the proof was not sufficient, without going into details. Counsel for the libellant. *708then requested a continuance for the purpose of producing . further evidence upon the ground of habitual intemperance. Time was given and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Waldron v. WaldronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Laing v. LaingHawaii Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Crow v. CrowOregon Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Richards v. RichardsHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  2. de Coito v. de CoitoHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Flint v. FlintHawaii Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Jem v. JemHawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Bruns v. BrunsHawaii Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API