Legal Opinion

Jem v. Jem

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1937No. 2308PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PETERS, J.

This is an action for divorce brought by the husband upon the grounds permitted by the eighth paragraph of section 4460, R. L. 1935, as amended by Act 27, L. 1935 (sr. C-109, p. 163). The eighth paragraph of the section was added by section 1 of Act 196, L. 1931. It provides: “Divorces from the bond of matrimony shall be granted for the causes hereinafter set forth and no other: * * *8. When either party is guilty toward the other of such cruel treatment, neglect or personal indignities, though not amounting to physical cruelty, continued over a course of not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. de Coito v. de CoitoHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Bartlett v. BartlettHawaii Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Aiken v. AikenHawaii Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Bruns v. BrunsHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Kauhimahu v. KauhimahuHawaii Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sisson v. SissonHawaii Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Itagaki v. ItagakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Petrowski v. PetrowskiHawaii Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API