Claybaugh v. Gancarz
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*65OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment in an action involving conflicting claims to an unpatented lode mining claim in Bull Frog Mining District, Nye County, Nevada. The senior locator was H. L. Claybaugh, appellant herein, under his asserted location of the Nine-oh lode mining claim. The junior locator was Frank Gancarz, under his asserted location of the Gancarz lode mining claim, which was subsequently located over the Nine-oh, under the assumption and theory that the Nine-oh location was void by reason of Claybaugh’s failure to comply with the requirements of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bismark Mountain Gold Mining Co. v. North Sunbeam Gold Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Flynn Group Mining Co. v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Zerres v. VaninaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1905
- Brown v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Ford v. CampbellNevada Supreme Court · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BrusseauIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Shope v. SimsAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Lombardo Turquoise Milling & Mining Co., Inc. v. HemanesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1977
- Claybaugh v. GancarzNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. BrusseauIdaho Supreme Court · 1975