Legal Opinion
Lombardo Turquoise Milling & Mining Co., Inc. v. Hemanes
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 24, 1977No. Civ. R-75-240 BRTPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUCE R. THOMPSON, District Judge.
This action was commenced on December 31, 1975. Plaintiff alleges ownership of the Windy 1, 3, 4, 5 through 16, and New Imperial 1 and 2 unpatented mining claims (hereafter the Windy Group). Plaintiff alleges the illegal location and possession by defendants of the following unpatented claims: Marie, Blue Mary, Blue Mary Extension, Darlene, Silver Bell No. 1, and Silver Bell No. 2, which conflict with his claims. Plaintiff prays for a temporary restraining order, a preliminary and final injunction, ejectment and damages. Plaintiff has waived a jury…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Thomson v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- South Dakota v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Tosco Corp. v. HodelDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- Marathon Oil Co. v. LujanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
- State of South Dakota v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Kenney v. GreerNevada Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.