Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Connall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1987No. 52768-7Published

1Opinion of the Court

108 Wn.2d 69 (1987)

736 P.2d 242

JAMES HOFFMAN, ET AL, Respondents,

v.

BRYAN G. CONNALL, ET AL, Respondents, CARDINAL REALTY, INC., ET AL, Petitioners.

No. 52768-7.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

April 30, 1987.

Lukins & Annis, P.S., by Terence R. Whitten and Erika Balazs, for petitioners.

Richard C. Agman, for respondents.

Ralph W. Holmen, Thomas L. Fishburne, and Donna R. Roper on behalf of the Association of Realtors, amici curiae for petitioners.

ANDERSEN, J.

FACTS OF CASE

At issue in this case is whether a real estate broker[1] is liable for innocently misrepresenting a material fact about…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Walker v. BangsWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McRae v. BolstadWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Lawson v. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Lyons v. Christ Episcopal ChurchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API