Legal Opinion

Walker v. Bangs

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1979No. 44936PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

This case involves allegations of negligence against attorneys Bangs and Castle in their handling of plaintiff Walker's personal injury action in federal court. Bangs and Castle counterclaimed for funds advanced Walker in the personal injury action. In the course of the malpractice trial in the King County Superior Court, plaintiff offered as an expert witness a lawyer not admitted to practice in this state. The trial court sustained defendants' objection to the qualification of the witness and rejected plaintiff's offer of proof of proposed testimony. Plaintiff's subsequent motion for a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Alaska Steamship Co. v. PettersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. O'NEIL v. BerganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API