People v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLIER, J.
We affirm an order denying appellant David Lee Williams’s motion to withdraw his no contest plea. His motion, which was made after *1287entry of judgment, was not timely under Penal Code section 1018.1 His argument that he had six months to file a motion to withdraw his plea is inconsistent with section 1018.
FACTS
On August 5, 2010, appellant was charged with one count of petty theft with a prior in violation of section 666. It was alleged that he suffered prior convictions including a prior theft-related conviction. On the same day, he pled no contest to the petty theft with a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. Superior Court (Giron)California Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. GuiamelonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012