Legal Opinion

People v. Guiamelon

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 2012No. B232188PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, P. J.

Dr. Rita Guiamelon, a physician, challenges her conviction under Business and Professions Code section 650 (section 650) for paying illegal fees to persons who referred patients qualified for federal and state programs to her practice. She contends this statute is preempted by the federal Medicaid antikickback statute (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)) under the doctrines of implied conflict and obstacle preemption. Her conflict preemption argument is that the federal antikickback statute requires a higher scienter than does section 650, making compliance with both federal and…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC v. Unitedhealth Group, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. Ameritox, Ltd. v. Millennium Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  3. People v. ParedesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. Paredes CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Spikener v. Ally Financial, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API