Legal Opinion
In Re Challenge to Nominating Petition of Haworth
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 4, 1969No. 4287, 4296, 4300PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
These cases were consolidated for hearing on individual applications for review of decisions of the District of Columbia Board of Elections. 1 Each case arises from a challenge to a nominating petition for a position on the Board of Education filed before the Board. 2 Each challenge presents different issues and we find it convenient to consider the cases separately in this opinion.
It is, however, appropriate to consider at the outset the scope of review of this court in these proceedings. Section 1 — 1108(j) (2), supra-, provides that “either the challenger or any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Koehn v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Muskego-Norway Consolidated Schools Joint School District No. 9 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Howell Tp. v. Div. of Tax AppealsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Pendleton v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Harvey v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Pendleton v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Curtis v. BindemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.