Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Bindeman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1970No. 5138PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

This case comes before the court on a petition to review the election on November 4, 1969, of Charles I. Cassell, inter-venor, 1 an at-large candidate for the Board of Education of the District of Columbia. 2 The petition, together with a motion for stay, was timely filed on November 25, 1969. A pre-hearing conference and a hearing on the merits were held on an expedited basis. Action on the motion for a stay has been held in abeyance pending this decision on the merits of the petition. 3

D.C.Code 1967, § 1-1111 (b) (Supp. II, 1969) 4 permits any person who voted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Challenge to Nominating Petition of HaworthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. In Re WeneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Gollin v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Lawrence v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Best v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API