Legal Opinion

Kroecker v. Camden Coke Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 31, 1913PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Chancellor.

This is a bill filed by George P. Nroecker and George W. Tucker, of the city of Camden, as complainants, on behalf of themselves and numerous other residents and property owners of said city, among whom are those whose affidavits are annexed to the *375bill, to enjoin the defendant, the Camden Coke Company, from operating its works in said city in such a manner as to produce smoke, cinders, gases, soot, dirt, tar, odors and vapors offensive and injurious to the health and comfort of the complainants and their families, and to the depreciation of their real estate.

The…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HollandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Kosich v. Poultrymen's Service Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  3. Roukovina v. Island Farm Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Benton v. KernanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  5. Oechsle v. RuhlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API