Legal Opinion
Libero v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 7, 1954PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, C. J.
This action was brought, pursuant to the provisions of § 6191 of the General Statutes, to recover from the defendant, which had issued to George Bodnar an automobile liability policy, the amount of judgments obtained by the plaintiffs against James Harris by reason of his negligent operation of Bodnar’s automobile. The court directed a verdict for the defendant and denied a motion to set the verdict aside. From the judgment entered on the verdict the plaintiffs have appealed.
Upon the evidence, the jury might reasonably have found the following facts: By the terms of the *576policy issued to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Laroche v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- McWilliams v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BulaongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Flint v. Universal Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Allstate Insurance v. Lake Shore Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Karner v. MaynorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.