Isserman v. Welt
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The complainants are the assignees of the vendee in a contract for the sale of land located in the city of Elizabeth, and the defendants are the vendors. This bill is filed for rescission of the contract and to impress a lien of the down money on the lands the subject of the sale. There is a counter-claim for specific performance. The contract of sale contains the following clause:
"It is specifically understood and agreed that the buildings upon the said premises are all within the boundary lines of the property as described in the deed therefor herein."
As a matter of fact, the building which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Goldstein v. EhrlickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Larkin v. KoetherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
3Cited by3 opinions
- Richeimer v. FischbeinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
- Harrington Co. v. KadreyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Richeimer v. FischbeinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930