Legal Opinion

Isserman v. Welt

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 4, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainants are the assignees of the vendee in a contract for the sale of land located in the city of Elizabeth, and the defendants are the vendors. This bill is filed for rescission of the contract and to impress a lien of the down money on the lands the subject of the sale. There is a counter-claim for specific performance. The contract of sale contains the following clause:

"It is specifically understood and agreed that the buildings upon the said premises are all within the boundary lines of the property as described in the deed therefor herein."

As a matter of fact, the building which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. EhrlickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  2. Larkin v. KoetherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richeimer v. FischbeinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  2. Harrington Co. v. KadreyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  3. Richeimer v. FischbeinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API