Legal Opinion

Richeimer v. Fischbein

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 18, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant, vendee, entered into a contract with defendants, vendors, for the purchase of certain land, and pursuant to the terms of that contract paid defendants $2,000 of the purchase price. The defendants being unable to perform, complainant brings his bill in this court to impress a lien upon said lands for the $2,000 paid.

Defendants moved at final hearing, without previous notice, to dismiss the bill on the ground that equity had no jurisdiction, basing their contention on Grant v. Olsan, 104 N.J. Eq. 242;144 Atl. Rep. 870, and Bailey v. B. Holding Co., 104 N.J. Eq. 241; 144 Atl. Rep.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Townsend v. VanderwerkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Elterman v. . HymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Ahrend v. OdiorneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. Jennisons v. LeonardSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Van Riper v. WickershamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reilly v. GriffithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Mihranian, Inc. v. PadulaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API