Legal Opinion

Larkin v. Koether

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 17, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This bill seeks the specific performance of a contract for the sale of lands. The complainants are vendors and the defendant is the vendee. The contract is dated June 3d 1926, and provides for the conveyance to the defendant of property therein described on or about June 30th, 1926, for the sum of $21,000, $2,100 of which was paid to the complainants by the defendant as a down payment on the execution of the contract. The property is described by metes and bounds and by reference to a map of the Weequahic Park Land and Improvement Company. The front line of the property is described as lying…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Orange Society of New Jerusalem v. KonskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  2. Orange Society v. KonskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  3. Herring v. EspositoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Drazin v. American Oil Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Zulver Realty Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Coastal Group v. PLANNED REAL EST.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  4. Harrington Co. v. KadreyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  5. Isserman v. WeltNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API