Richeimer v. Fischbein
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The present action arises out of a contract for the sale of land in Newark. The contract provided that the existing buildings were within the metes and bounds recited in the agreement, and that there were no encroachments. The down-money was paid. It was then discovered that there was great doubt as to whether the buildings were within the bounds described in the contract and whether there were encroachments. The complainant alleged that the defects could not be corrected, and filed his bill in equity seeking a cancellation of the contract and praying in that event that he may have a lien…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Townsend v. VanderwerkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Elterman v. . HymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Bostwick v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Haughwout & Pomeroy v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1871
- Kempshall v. StoneNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reilly v. GriffithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Freedman v. LiebermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Dependents of Vlahos v. Rutland RestaurantSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Mihranian, Inc. v. PadulaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Brauer v. Trustees of First MethodistSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.