Legal Opinion

Septran, Inc. v. Independent School District No. 271, Bloomington, Minnesota

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 3, 1996No. C9-96-1114PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS G. FORSBERG, Judge. *

Appellant challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment for respondent on appellant’s breach of contract claims. Appellant argues that the parties’ contract was not invalidated by appellant’s failure to provide a performance bond, respondent waived the defense of invalidity, the contract should be enforced based on appellant’s substantial performance under the contract, and respondent’s failure to move for summary judgment on appellant’s claim that respondent improperly withheld payment under the contract precluded summary judgment on that claim.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Niccum v. Hydra Tool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Minnesota-Iowa Television Co. v. Watonwan T v. Improvement Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bolander v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Hebrink v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Brooksbank v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Bradley v. First Nat. Bank of Walker, N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Loppe v. SteinerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API