Brooksbank v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Judge.
Respondent James Brooksbank brought an action against appellant Harlan Anderson to enforce a guarantee agreement. The district court held that a 1996 agreement was valid and enforceable, and, therefore, found in favor of respondent. This appeal is from a judgment awarding respondent $86,869.95. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
In 1984, appellant Harlan Anderson and respondent James Brooksbank formed a corporation, Total Mix Ration, Inc., for the purpose of developing, producing, and marketing a device for mixing feed for farm animals. Each owned…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Harrington v. HarringtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Estrada v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bob Acres, LLC v. Schumacher Farms, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Adedipe v. U.S. Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- AZOX L.L.C. v. Bloom International Realty, L.L.C.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Brooksbank v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.