Legal Opinion

State v. Matthews

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 26, 1994No. 91D102961; CA A79394PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. The court granted his pretrial motion to suppress evidence obtained after the truck that he was driving was stopped by a police officer. It held that the stop was unlawful, because the state failed to prove that defendant had, in fact, committed a traffic infraction. The state appeals, ORS 138.060(3), and we reverse and remand.

Near midnight on May 22, 1991, Officer Frye was southbound on a rural highway when defendant’s truck, in the oncoming lane, caused a glare in his eyes. Frye believed that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. DohertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. StonerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MatthewsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. TiffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API