United States v. Williams
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
*1126 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT NAEEM WILLIAMS’ MOTION FOR PRETRIAL DETERMINATION THAT THE DEATH PENALTY CANNOT BE CARRIED OUT AGAINST NAEEM WILLIAMS BECAUSE OF A DISQUALIFYING MENTAL CAPACITY WITHIN THE MEANING OF 18 U.S.C. § 3596(c) AND ATKINS v. VIRGINIA, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The United States has charged Defendant Naeem Williams (“Defendant” or “Williams”) with crimes that qualify him for possible imposition of the death penalty under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3591 & 3592. Defendant has moved pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3596(c), and Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ricky Chase v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Anthony Carr v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
- Manpreet Singh v. Unknown Party, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Ricky Chase v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.