Legal Opinion
United States v. Wilson
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 15, 2016No. 04-CR-1016 (NGG)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge
On February 7, 2013, the court found that Defendant Ronell Wilson was not intellectually disabled1 and, therefore, *350was eligible to receive the death penalty for the 2003 murder of two undercover police detectives. See United States v. Wilson, 922 F.Supp.2d 334 (E.D.N.Y.2013) (“Wilson II”).2 In reaching that decision, the court determined that Wilson had failed to show that he suffered from significantly subaverage intellectual functioning, a necessary prerequisite to a finding of intellectual disability. Id. at 368.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hall v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Brumfield v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Ex Parte BrisenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Hooks v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Joseph Clifton Smith v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- Ex parte MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Alvin Jackson v. Dexter PayneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Alvin Jackson v. Wendy KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Bean (Jerimiah) Vs. State (Death Penalty-Direct)Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.