Legal Opinion

Ricky Chase v. State of Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2015No. 2013-CA-01089-SCTPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*466CHANDLER, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Ricky Chase filed a motion for post-conviction relief (PCR) in the Circuit Court of Copiah County arguing that he is intellectually disabled under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), and exempt from execution. The circuit court denied relief, finding that Chase had failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he is intellectually disabled.1 Chase appeals, arguing that the circuit court made legal errors and that its fact-findings were clearly erroneous. We affirm. We take the opportunity presented by this…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Hall v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Chase v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Smith v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Ex parte MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  3. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  4. Anthony Carr v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Greg Canerdy v. Don MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API