Legal Opinion

McGraw v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, the defendants in the court below made motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit. N. C. Code, 1935 (Michie), sec. 567. The court below overruled these motions, and in this we can see no error.

This case was here on ajopeal from judgment of nonsuit (see 206 N. 0., 873). Brogden, J., wrote a thorough opinion, setting out the facts and law. The nonsuit was overruled and also the opinion evidence which was not allowed in the court below was held to be competent. The Court said, at p. 882: “In other words, was Pendry on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bailey v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Hamilton v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Phillips v. Interstate Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Beck v. . Wilkins-Ricks CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Chesson v. Washington County BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Maddox v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Mintz v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Robinson v. . McAlhaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. In Re BadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API