Legal Opinion

Chesson v. Washington County Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1925PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The order of examination, from which the defendants appeal, was entered on motion in the cause, made by plaintiffs under authority of C. S., 900 et'seq., to procure information for the drafting of their complaint.

According to the decisions, dealing directly with the subject, it has been held that, after the commencement of an action, a preliminary examination of the defendant may be had by the plaintiff, (1) before filing complaint, if it be made to appear that such is necessary to enable the plaintiff to draft his complaint (Holt v. Warehouse Co., 116 N. C., 480) ; and (2) after pleadings…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thornton v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Vann v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Holt v. Southern Finishing & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. Fields v. . ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. State v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bohannon v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State v. Ravensford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Knight v. . LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. McGraw v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Bell v. Murchison National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API