Legal Opinion

In Re McKinney

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2005No. 04-0651PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Per curiam

Delmar “Bo” McKinney and Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. d/b/a Edward Jones (collectively “Edward Jones”) seek mandamus relief after the trial court denied their motion to compel arbitration. Because the Federal Arbitration Act requires the trial court to compel arbitration in this case, we conditionally grant their petition and order the trial court to compel arbitration in accordance with the parties’ agreement.

As a young child, Keith Rohlaek received a cash settlement following the death of his father. The money was invested and held in a custodial account with Edward Jones. After turning…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. EZ Pawn Corp. v. ManciasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. N&d Fashions, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation and Nelly Don, Inc., a Missouri Corporation v. Dhj Industries, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. In Re Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Royston, Rayzor, Vickery, & Williams, Llp v. Francisco "Frank" LopezTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In Re Border Steel, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2007
  4. In Re Green Tree Servicing LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  5. Daily Instruments Corp v. HeidtDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API