Legal Opinion

City of Aurora v. Krauss

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 15, 1936No. 13,647PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAUSS sued the city (formerly town) of Aurora to recover judgment on thirteen one thousand dollar bonds owned by him, payment of which was in default. For a first cause of action he alleged the bonds to be general obligations of the city. In a second cause of action, plaintiff alleged the liability of the city for payment of the bonds by reason of "guaranty certificates" endorsed thereon. The city denied the allegations, setting up numerous defenses in its answer. Plaintiff recovered judgment for the face of the bonds and interest. The city assigns error.

December 7, 1925, the town board of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayor of Valverde v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Deter v. City of DeltaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Sauer v. Town of GillettColorado Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Wangnild v. Town of HaxtunSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  3. Bradfield v. PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API