Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentThomas Gallagher, Justice
I am of the opinion that the defense of usury, while not available to Industrial Credit Company,1 is available to plaintiffs, whose liability *36for the corporate indebtedness was direct and primary rather than secondary. In states where, by statute, a plea of usury is not available to a corporation, it is well settled that an individual secondarily liable for the corporate debt likewise may not invoke the plea in litigation relative thereto.2 The basis for the rule is that since the debt was valid when contracted by the corporation, it could not become invalidated by the subsequent creation of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Carozza v. Federal Finance & Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Salvin v. . Myles Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Border Nat. Bank v. American Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- Nading v. McGregorIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Patterson v. . BirdsallNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.