Legal Opinion

Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 8, 1961No. 37,879Published

1Opinion of the Court

261 Minn. 26 (1961)

110 N.W. (2d) 484

MELBOURNE DAHMES AND ANOTHER

v.

INDUSTRIAL CREDIT COMPANY.

No. 37,879.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

September 8, 1961.

Jerome B. Simon and Bundlie, Kelley & Torrison, for appellant.

Brill & Brill, for respondents.

Dorsey, Owen, Barber, Marquart & Windhorst, for First National Bank of Minneapolis; Faegre & Benson, for Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis; Doherty, Rumble & Butler, for Northwestern National Bank of St. Paul; Robert I. Lang, for Minnesota Bankers Association; Clarence O. Holten and James S. Eriksson, for James Talcott, Inc., Minneapolis Securities…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. General Phoenix Corp. v. CabotNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Carozza v. Federal Finance & Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Salvin v. . Myles Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Border Nat. Bank v. American Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
  5. Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API