Legal Opinion
United States v. Cimino
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 9, 1962PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
A three count indictment charges the defendants with violations of the Narcotic Control Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174, 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 173, 174 (1961) ,1 The defendant Cimino has moved for an order of discovery and inspection with respect to certain documents pursuant to Fed.R. Crim.P. Rule 16. Both defendants have moved for a bill of particulars pursuant to Rule 7(f), Fed.R.Crim.P.
Defendant Cimino’s motion for discovery requests inspection of “all statements, documents, admissions and papers in possession of the United States Government, its employees or agents, which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Edwin MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. KushnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. LeightonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- United States v. CrisonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- United States v. PaydenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- United States v. LeonelliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- United States v. TuckerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.