Legal Opinion
United States v. Payden
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 8, 1985No. SS 84 Cr 566 (DNE)PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Defendant Donald Payden (“Payden”) has filed pretrial motions covering a wide range of issues. Defendants Anthony Grant (“Grant”) and Eugene Coleman (“Coleman”) have joined in Payden’s motions. The background of this case has been set forth elsewhere, see United States v. Payden, 609 F.Supp. 1273 (S.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd 768 F.2d 487 (2d Cir.1985); in re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Jan. 2, 1985 (Simels), 605 F.Supp. 839 (S.D.N.Y.1985), rev’d, 767 F.2d 26 (2d Cir.1985); United States v. Payden, 598 F.Supp. 1388 (S.D.N.Y.1984), rev’d, 759 F.2d…
2Cases cited117 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- People v. PensingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- United States v. StrawberryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- United States v. MurgasDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.