Legal Opinion
Parks Cab Co. v. Annunzio
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided September 17, 1952No. 32113PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer
The question presented is whether, under the unique circumstances of this case, certain taxicab drivers are employees of the Parks Cab Company under the Unemployment Compensation Act. A referee found them to be employees, and the Board of Review of the Department of Labor affirmed the finding. A judgment of the superior court of Cook County in an administrative review proceeding confirmed the decision of the Board of Review. The cab company appeals.
The question as to the status of the drivers as employees arose when a former file clerk and a former driver sought unemployment compensation. If…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy v. DaumitIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- New York Life Insurance v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Kaus v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Wallace v. AnnunzioIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Smith v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hannigan v. GoldfarbNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Sebago v. Boston Cab Dispatch, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- O'Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Commonwealth Life & Accident Insurance v. Board of Review of the Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
- Gerardo Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int'l Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.