Legal Opinion

Kaus v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 4, 1941No. 45533PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.

— The principal question involved is whether the relation of employer-employee exists between plaintiff and drivers of his taxicabs. Defendant-appellant Commission contends that it does. Plaintiff-appellee claims the relation between him and the drivers is that of bailor and bailee.

Plaintiff-appellee, Peter J. Kaus, operates a taxi business in Council Bluffs under the trade name, United Cab Co. He owns ten taxicabs with the name and insignia of the United Cab Co. painted on each cab. He has a central downtown office and garage together with eleven taxicab stands or stations at convenient…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In Re the Claim of MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Matter of Glielmi v. Netherland Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Jones v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  4. Washington Recorder Publishing Co. v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Mallinger v. Webster City Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bengford Ex Rel. Bengford v. Carlem Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. Morgan Cab Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hannigan v. GoldfarbNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. HarveySupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  5. Meredith Publishing Co. v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API