Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Annunzio

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1952No. 32062PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bristow

Plaintiffs, G. H. Wallace and C. B. Cannon, doing business as Wallace and Cannon, are appealing from a judgment of the superior court of Cook County, entered in a proceeding under the Administrative Review Act, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1949, chap, no, par. 264 et seq.,) in favor of defendant, Frank Annunzio, Director of Labor of the State of Illinois, in the amount of $733.66 for a deficiency in plaintiffs’ contributions under the Illinois Unemployment Compensation Act.

The sole issue herein is whether the individuals officing with plaintiffs’ law firm, under an oral agreement, could be deemed to be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. New York Life Insurance v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Toplis & Harding, Inc. v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. John P. Moriarty, Inc. v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Virginia Employment Commission v. Peninsula Emergency Physicians, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  2. O'Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Parks Cab Co. v. AnnunzioIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Menning v. Department of Registration & EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API