Legal Opinion

Merchants National Bank of Mobile v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 8, 1982No. 565-80CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, Chief Judge

The plaintiff bank seeks to recover the unpaid balance under a contract by which the plaintiffs assignor, Concept National, Inc. ("Concept”), agreed to furnish goods to the government. The bank received the assignment as security for a loan it made to Concept to finance the transaction. The financing took the form of an international letter of credit. The goods were manufactured in Korea, and the government refused to pay for part of the goods upon their delivery in the United States, because they were defective. The plaintiff does not deny that the goods were defective but contends that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Russell Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Emeco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  4. Produce Factors Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. Atlantic National Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thomas Funding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  2. Nelson Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Chula Vista City School District v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. City of Alexandria v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Applied Companies v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API