Legal Opinion

Hall v. City of Youngstown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1968No. 41382PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The only question to be resolved by this court in this case is whether the defendant was acting in a governmental capacity or a proprietary capacity in providing the allegedly defective hydrant.

Defendant relies heavily on prior decisions of this court as reason for this court to decide the issue before us adversely to plaintiff. The earliest case relied upon by defendant is the case of Wheeler v. Cincinnati, 19 Ohio St. 19. The syllabus in the Wheeler case provides:

“The power conferred by the statute, on cities of this state, to organize and regulate fire companies, and provide engines, etc.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Aldrich v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  3. City of Barberton v. MikschOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Gabris v. BlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Hyde v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ranells v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Wells v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Riffle v. Physicians & Surgeons Ambulance Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. King v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Cross v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API