Legal Opinion
Kouri v. Todd
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided August 22, 1990No. Civ. A. 90-0582-APublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
The threshold dismissal motion at bar presents an issue not uncommon in Title VII cases — namely, whether a person not named as a party in the administrative proceeding can be named as a party in the succeeding court action. Here, plaintiff Karen Kouri filed this Title VII sexual harassment action 1 naming her employer, Liberian Services, Inc. (“LSI”), and her supervisor, James Todd, as defendants. In the antecedent administrative proceeding, however, only LSI was named as a respondent. Todd now moves for dismissal of the Title VII claim against him…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glus v. G. C. Murphy Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Arcangel Alvarado v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College, Raul Parilla, as President of Montgomery Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Phyllis S. Hamm v. Members of the Board of Regents of the State of Florida, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Chastang v. Flynn and Emrich CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
- Haddon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nicol v. Imagematrix, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
- Tietgen v. Brown's Westminster Motors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- Afande v. National Lutheran Home for the AgedDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
- Carter v. Arlington Public School SystemDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Armstead v. Becton Dickinson Primary Care Diagnostics, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.