Legal Opinion
Armstead v. Becton Dickinson Primary Care Diagnostics, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 8, 1996No. Civil No. L-95-911PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LEGG, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants Patricia Belmonte’s, Elizabeth Wolffs, and George Snediker’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 56(b). This suit is brought under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”) for alleged unlawful discrimination against plaintiff and under section 509 of the Rehabilitation Act. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion to dismiss will be GRANTED by separate ORDER.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiff Linda D. Armstead was hired by Becton Dickinson Primary Care…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Donald R. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DATA GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Glus v. G. C. Murphy Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rogers v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Jeffries v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Valluzzi v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020