Legal Opinion

Com. of Mass. v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 12, 2018No. Civil Action No. 17–11930–NMGPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORTON, United States District Judge

This case involves a dispute about the validity of two Interim Final Rules ("IFRs") issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Department of the Treasury and the United States Department of Labor (collectively "defendants" or "the Departments") on October 6, 2017. The IFRs expand the religious exemption to the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act ("ACA") and create a new moral exemption to that mandate.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts ("plaintiff" or "the Commonwealth") alleges that 1) the Departments…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth of MA v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  2. Pennsylvania v. TrumpDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. California v. Health & Human Servs.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS v. U.S. Dept. of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API